Model United Nations (MUN) is more than dramatic speeches and polite disagreements — it’s a structured simulation of real-world diplomacy. A clear, fair procedure is the backbone of every successful MUN committee. This blog explains how to design MUN procedures that keep debate productive, encourage participation, and reflect authentic United Nations practice — all in a way students can follow.
Start with the committee’s purpose and level
First, decide the committee type and experience level. General Assembly (GA) committees use broader, more formal procedures than crisis or specialized committees. Beginner-level MUNs should simplify rules; advanced conferences can incorporate complex motions, moderated caucuses with strict timekeeping, and advanced voting procedures. The committee’s purpose (e.g., human rights, security council, crisis) will also determine how dynamic the process should be.
Create a clear agenda-setting process
A good MUN procedure begins with a transparent method for setting the agenda. Options include:
-
Pre-set single agenda (easiest for beginners).
-
Two- or three-topic agenda with formal voting to choose the order.
-
Open agenda where delegates propose topics during opening sessions.
If you allow multiple agenda items, include a simple voting mechanism (show of placards or roll-call) and a tie-break rule (e.g., the dais chair breaks ties).
Define speaking formats and the flow of debate
Establish two main modes: formal debate and caucusing.
Formal debate
-
Start with an opening speaker list (first-speaker list) compiled from delegates who wish to speak.
-
Standard speaking times (e.g., 60–90 seconds for moderated comments, 1–3 minutes for formal speeches).
-
Points that interrupt (Point of Order, Point of Personal Privilege, Right of Reply) should be explicitly defined and limited to essential uses.
Caucus (informal debate)
-
Unmoderated caucus: delegates freely discuss and draft position papers/resolutions. Define maximum time (e.g., 10–30 minutes) and limits on re-requesting the same caucus.
-
Moderated caucus: the dais calls on speakers on a specific subtopic with short speaking times (30–60 seconds). Specify total caucus length and sub-topic time allocation.
Define motions, points, and their precedence
List all allowed points and motions, with brief explanations and typical use:
-
Points: Point of Order, Point of Personal Privilege, Point of Parliamentary Inquiry, Point of Information to the Chair, Right of Reply.
-
Motions: Motion to Open/Close Debate, Motion for a Moderated/Unmoderated Caucus, Motion to Set the Agenda, Motion to Adjourn Debate, Motion to Table/Un-Table.
Order of precedence matters. For example, points interrupt; motions require majority consent or two-thirds depending on gravity (adjournment often needs simple majority, closure of debate may require two-thirds). Specify voting thresholds clearly.
Drafting and submitting working papers and draft resolutions
Establish a step-by-step process for producing written outcomes:
-
Working papers: informal drafts circulated to the dais, not yet formatted as resolutions.
-
Draft resolutions: require sponsorship (e.g., at least 3 sponsors) and signatories (optional number).
-
Submission deadline and format: indicate font, spacing, and clause structure (preambulatory and operative clauses).
-
Dais reviews: allow the dais to check grammar/formatting but not content editing.
Also specify whether friendly amendments (when all sponsors agree) can be incorporated without voting, and the process for unfriendly amendments (requires motion and vote).
Voting procedure
Choose whether to follow simple majority rules or UN-style roll call for important votes. Common elements:
-
Voting method: placard, roll call, or electronic (if available).
-
Distinguish between procedural and substantive votes: procedural votes usually need a simple majority and are not vetoable (for Security Council simulations, permanent members may have veto power on substantive votes only).
-
Abstentions: explain how abstentions count (do they count toward the quorum? do they count in majorities?).
-
Division of the question: allow delegates to vote on operative clauses separately if requested and approved.
Ensure fairness with dais and chair guidelines
Write clear expectations for the dais: impartiality, timekeeping, enforcing rules, and assisting with resolution formatting. Provide escalation steps for disputes: first correction by chair, then appeal to the dais, and if needed, a motion to appeal the ruling.
Add practical rules and logistics
Include:
-
Quorum rules (minimum number of present delegates to conduct business).
-
Timekeeping procedures (who holds the timer, how warnings are given).
-
Rules on decorum (dress code, language, mobile phone usage).
-
Consequences for violations (warnings, removal from the committee as a last resort).
Test and iterate
Before the conference, run a mock session with volunteers to see whether timings, motion thresholds, and amendment processes work. Collect feedback and refine the rules. Clear, tested procedures produce smoother sessions and happier delegates.
Final tips for chairs and organizers
-
Keep the rules accessible: publish a concise Rules of Procedure (1–2 pages) plus a detailed manual for the dais.
-
Train the dais thoroughly and have cheat-sheets for common scenarios.
-
Encourage inclusivity: allow new delegates simplified options (shorter speaking time, mentor pairings).
-
Balance realism with fun: aim for authenticity, but avoid rules so complex they discourage participation.
Conclusion
Creating strong MUN procedures is about balancing authenticity, clarity, and practicality. A well-designed procedure empowers delegates to debate substantively, draft meaningful resolutions, and learn real diplomatic skills. Start with the committee’s purpose, define speaking and voting rules clearly, build a straightforward drafting and amendment process, and always test before you host. With clear rules and fair chairs, your MUN will run like a well-oiled assembly — spirited, constructive, and memorable.

